| 
		 
		Justice
		Website Design, Content and the Reports © April 2, 2002 by 
		Eric Krause, Krause House Info-Research 
		Solutions (© 1996) 
		All 
		Images © Parks Canada Unless Otherwise Designated 
		
		  Researching the Fortress of Louisbourg National Historic Site of 
		Canada  
		  Recherche sur la Forteresse-de-Louisbourg Lieu historique national du 
		Canada 
		The 
		Administration Of Justice At The Fortress Of Louisbourg (1713-1758) 
        
        
		1753
        - 1754 
  
      
      
      
		
			- 
          
Procédure criminelle instruite au
          Bailliage Royal de Louisbourg contre le nommé Yacinthe Gabriel
LeBon, accusé et convaindu de profonation et sacrilège pour s'être introduit de nuit dans la
chapelle du Fort alors qu'il était ivre. Condamné à être pendu par le
          Bailliage, sentence maintenue
par le Conseil le 25 octobre 1754. ( Pièces cotées de 1 à 25 pour le procès au Baillages et 6 pièces
non cotées pour l'appel au Conseil.) 1753, janvier à 1754, octobre G2 189 Folios 148-269 H J 31
Archives Nationales, Section Outre-Mer, G2, Volume 189    
			- 
          
	Procédure criminelle contre Hyacinthe Gabriel Lebon, accusé de vol et profanation dans la
chapelle du fort et absous. 17 janvier 1753- 28 septembre 1754. 24 pièces. G2 201
Dossier 260 H J 31 Archives Nationales, Section Outre-Mer, G2, Volume 201  
			- 
          
	Certificat de dépot au Conseil Superieur de Louisbourg de la procédure criminelle contre
Jacinthe Gabriel Le Bon, accusé de vol et profantation 3 & 11 octobre 1754. 1 pièce. G2
209 Dossier 514 H J 31 Archives Nationales, Section Outre-Mer, G2, Volume 209
              
		 
		 
           
      
		 
			- 
          
	An even choicer scandal occurred here in 1754 when the verger entered the Chapel one
morning to find the altar in disorder. The altar cloth was bloodstained and dirty with
footmarks and there were onion peels and bread scattered about. A crucifix was broken
and there was blood on a picture frame above the altar. The culprit was an unemployed
school teacher who had come from another colony looking for work. As a last resort, he
had decided to become a soldier. On the night in question, he said he had gone to the
barracks to get back an arithmetic book he had lent a soldier. He was quite drunk, and as
he walked in the terreplein, he noticed the Chapel door was open. He went in and climbed
the stairs to the balcony. He jumped down from there to the floor and said he wanted to
get near the altar to pray. As he did so, he noticed that he didn't like the flower
arrangement on the altar, so he climbed on the altar to move the bouquets, in the process
of which he cut his face. While taking out his handkerchief to wipe the blood away, the
bread and onions fell from his pocket. His bloodied hand, meanwhile, left stains on the
tabernacle and picture frame. He finally staggered out, feeling he had done quite enough.  
		 
      
	When he was apprehended, the death penalty was sought, but in the end he was ordered to
march barefoot, wearing only a shirt, to the Chapel door to ask the forgiveness of God
and the King, while carrying a sign which read "Profaner of Sacred Places". He was then
ordered to pay a small fine and was banished forever from Ile Royale. [R. J. Morgan,
Gossips' Tour of Louisbourg, Unpublished Report H F 30 (Fortress of Louisbourg, July,
1975), pp. 10-11] 	 
       
      
		- 
          
			The
        second incident, equally bizarre, took place in 1754. At 8:30 in the
        morning the verger entered the chapel to find the altar in disorder. The
        altar cloth was bloodstained and dirty with foot marks, and there were
        onion peels and bread scattered about. Blood was smeared on the
        tabernacle and on the frame of the picture on the wall above the altar.
        A crucifix was broken and a small niche containing statues was damaged.
        The small drawers of the altar had been rifled and various ornaments
        displaced. Two candles and a small purificator were missing.  
		 
      
        
		The
        culprit was revealed to be an unemployed school teacher who had come to
        the colony looking for work but had had to take up fishing and
        woodcutting, for which he was not suited. As a last resort he had
        decided to become a soldier. On the night in question he admitted going
        up to the barracks to get back an arithmetic book he had loaned to a
        soldier. He admitted he was quite drunk at the time, and, the door of
        the corridor of the soldier's room being closed, he walked about in the
        courtyard until he noticed the chapel door open. He went inside, and!
        since there was a partition with a locked door which separated this
        entrance from the body of the church, he climbed up to the balcony and
        jumped down. He said he only wanted to get nearer the altar to pray, and
        after a while it occurred to him that the two bouquets of flowers on the
        altar were not placed as they were in France, between the candle sticks,
        but rather they were to one side. He took it upon himself to correct
        this divergence from orthodoxy and found himself climbing on the altar,
        in the process of which he cut himself on the face. While taking out his
        handkerchief to wipe the blood the bread and onions fell out, He then
        claimed to have dropped the handkerchief and, while retrieving it,
        inadvertently picked up the purificator as well. His bloodied hand left
        the stains on the tabernacle and picture frame. Having decided that this
        was enough he took two small candles to light his way out through the
        town, and, placing a board against the partition, climbed back to the
        gallery and then out into the courtyard. He stopped at the guard-house
        to get a light and then left. It was observed that the tabernacle had
        not been forced and the protagonist, Le Bon, was vigorous in denying
        that he had tried to open it. 
        
		In
        all it was a very strange case and despite more than two hundred pages
        of testimony it appears that the full story was not revealed. The death
        penalty was sought, but in the end Le Bon was ordered to march barefoot
        with only a shirt to the chapel door and ask forgiveness of God and
        King, while carrying a sign which read, front and back, PROFANER OF
        SACRED PLACES. He was then fined the sum of three livres and
        banished perpetually from the colony ... [Blaine
        Adams, The Construction and Occupation of the Barracks of the King's
        Bastion, Unpublished Report H A 13 (Fortress of Louisbourg, July
        1971), The Chapel]  
       
      
		- 
          
A
          King's Bastion sentry met Gabriel Hyathinthe LeBon as he left the
          chapel towards midnight and insisted that he go to the guardhouse to
          light a tallow candle before going on. Because LeBon was drunk and
          also bleeding, the guards persuaded him to spend the night at the
          guardhouse. He was later charged for damage he had done in the chapel,
          but keeping him at the guard house seems to have been done on the
          initiative of the guards. [Source: Christopher Moore, "Law. Order
          and Street Life," (March, 1977) in Second Draft Report,
          Contract Research 1977, Unpublished Report H F 39R (Fortress of
          Louisbourg, 1977), p. 4.] 
              
		- Woeful
          though the state of religious affairs was in the colony in mid-January
          1753, the inhabitants of Louisbourg had their attention shifted from
          that concern to a much more controversial matter when a case of
          alleged profanation occurred in the Chapelle de Saint-Louis.
          Profanation was regarded by both church and state as an extremely
          serious crime in the eighteenth century. According to the king's
          ordinance of 1728 on military crimes, soldiers who swore or blasphemed
          were to have their tongues pierced by a hot iron; those who stole from
          a church were to be hanged and strangled; those who profaned holy
          objects while stealing were to be burnt at the stake. ... The
          punishments for civilians guilty of such crimes were not as cut and
          dried, but they could be equally harsh. 
          
The
          alleged profanation case at Louisbourg involved a civilian drifter
          named Yacinthe Gabriel Le Bon ... Aged thirty-three at the time of the
          incident, Le Bon had sailed to Louisbourg from Brittany in 1752
          without any trade but with the hope of teaching the colonists and
          their children "how to read and write and also arithmetic."
          Yet he never got around to doing any teaching, opting instead to work
          at sea for a short while and then at cutting firewood in the forest.
          Finally, "not being able to earn his keep otherwise," he
          thought about becoming a soldier. For all of his apparent
          irresolution, Le Bon seems to have been a religious man. On Christmas
          Eve, 1752, he helped the chapel verger (bedeau) set up the
          parish church for the midnight service, even staying afterward to
          extinguish the candles. Three and a half weeks later, however, he
          would return to the chapel in a drunken state to commit "attrocious
          acts" that would shock the Louisbourg community. 
          On the
          night of 16 January 1753, le Bon went to the soldiers' barracks in the
          King's Bastion to pick up a book on arithmetic he had earlier left in
          one of the soldiers' rooms. Intoxicated and unable to open the door
          leading to the barracks rooms, Le Bon noticed that a nearby door to
          the Chapelle de Saint-Louis was open. Entering, he climbed the stairs
          to the balcony and then down into the body of the church by slipping
          over a partition wall on the ground floor level. Intent on praying, or
          so he claimed later, he was approaching the altar when he noticed the
          flower arrangement was not the same as he was familiar with in France
          (the bouquets were to one side rather than between the candlesticks).
          Climbing on the altar to shift the flowers Le Bon accidentally cut
          himself, leaving blood-stains on the purificator, tabernacle, and
          picture frame. The intruder also dropped some bread and onions in the
          general area of the altar when he withdrew a handkerchief to wipe the
          blood off his face. Then, tired of stumbling around in the chapel, Le
          Bon took two small candles, climbed back out the way he had entered,
          and left the chapel. 
          Le
          Bon's nocturnal visit to the parish church was not discovered until
          the following morning when the verger arrived at the chapel around
          8:30. The scene that greeted him was one that indicated a serious
          profanation of a holy place. There was mud and blood splattered all
          around, evidence that someone had walked on the altar, a niche was
          broken off the tabernacle, two candles had been stolen, and food
          [bread and onions] had apparently been consumed in the altar area. The
          desecration was reported immediately to the parish priest, Isidore
          Caulet, who in turn notified the royal officials. An investigation was
          begun which quickly led to the arrest of Yacinthe Gabriel Le Bon, for
          the night before he had stopped at the King's Bastion guardhouse to
          obtain a light for the chapel candles he had taken. The case dragged
          on for twenty-one months with witnesses being called and several
          interrogations of Le Bon taking place. The prosecutor, arguing that
          "it is important to make an example" of the accused to
          protect God's temple and religion, urged that Le Bon be punished with
          the full rigour of the ordinances. He advocated that the young man be
          hanged and strangled until dead with his corpse being left at the town
          square for twenty-four hours, and then transferred to the fork in the
          roads of the fauxbourg for a further period of public display. The
          court's decision, however, was more lenient, as it obviously took into
          account Le Bon's drunkenness and the fact that he had not tried to
          force the tabernacle. Le Bon's punishment was to be led to the main
          door of the Chapelle de Saint-Louis, dressed only in a chemise and
          with a rope around his neck and a candle in his hands, to make an
          amende honorable, asking on his knees for the forgiveness of God and
          king. On his front and on his back were to be signs that read
          "profaner of Sacred places." Following that act of atonement
          he was to be fined three livres and banished from the colony
          for the rest of his life. 
          The way
          in which the royal officials handled the Le Bon case - the prompt
          arrest, thorough investigation, and harsh judgment - provides yet
          another illustration of the close ties that existed between church and
          state in eighteenth-century New France. A desecration of a chapel was
          viewed by both as a heinous crime that had to be dealt with quickly
          and severely. That Le Bon got off as lightly as he did was fortunate
          for him, as he could have easily been executed for his drunken
          misadventure. That possibility, or lesson, would not have been lost on
          most of the inhabitants of the town. [A. J. B. Johnston, Religion
          in Life at Louisbourg, 1713 - 1758 (Kingston: McGill-Queen's
          University Press, 1984), pp. 58-60]  
		 
	[148-269] Les extraits qui suivent ont été empruntés à un procès criminel instruit contre
Hyacinthe LeBon, accusé et convaincu de profonation et de sacrilège, pour s'être introduit
dans la chapelle du fort durant la nuit, alors qu'il était ivre, et y avoir causé certains
dommages. Le procès au Baillage débute en janvier 1753, le condamné en appelle au
Conseil Supérieur en septembre 1754. La sentence du Baillage (peine de mort) est
maintenue et exécutée en octobre 1754.   
	[149-150] Procès-verbal de la descente dans la chapelle du fort: L'an mil sept cent
cinquante-trois, dix-sept du mois de janvier, sur les onze heures du matin nous Laurent de
[Dominique] Meyracq, conseiller du Roy baillif juge civil et criminel du baillage royal de
Louisbourg, Ile Royale, sur l'avis qui vient de nous être donné qu'il aviat été commis un
vol la nuit dernière dans la chapelle du fort.(...) par un quidam, nous nous sommes
transportés avec le procureur du Roy et le greffier dans la dite chapelle pour dresser
procès verbal de l'Etat des fractures s'il en a été faitte vu les autres circonstances qui
peuvent avoir du rapport au dit vol. Etant dans la dite chapelle nous avons remarqué sur la
nappe qui couvre l'autel plusieurs taches de sang de même que plusieurs taches de boue
(...) Nous avons en outre remarqué une tache de sang au bout de la corniche qui est au
haut du tabernacle de même qu'une autre goutte de sang sur le cadre du tableau qui est
au-dessus du tabernacle, la niche cassée en plusieurs endroits et un crucifix de cuivre jaune
dedans ayant le pied écrasé et ayant ensuite regardé si le tabernacle avait été forcé, nous
n'avons point trouvé aucune fracture. .... apres quoi le nommé marc Bedau de la dite
chapelle nous aurait dit qu'il était venu ce matin à l'église sur les huit heures et demi, il
aurait trouvé la nappe de l'autel (dans l'état actuel), ... qu'il a également trouvé la porte du
tabernacle ouverte; ... aussi trouvé par terre sur la marche de l'autel un St-Esprit qui était
en dedans de la niche, que les deux petits anges qui étaient ordinairement à cotté de la
niche, il les a trouvés au dessus du tabernacle à la place de la niche que les quatre petites
chandelliers et les Bouquet qui étaient au dessus du tabernacle.... que le voleur s'est
introduit dans l'église par la porte qui monte à la tribune qui est ordinairement ouverte
faute de clef. Ayant remarqué que le voleur aurait placé une planche qui était par terre au
bas de l'église, contre la cloison qui donne sur l'escalier de la tribune au moyen de laquelle
il est remonté pour sortir par la dite porte.   
	[195-247] Extraits d'interrogatoires: ...répond (l'accusé) qu'il s'y est introduit... par la
porte de la cour qui donne sur lescalier montant à la tribune, l'ayant trouvée ouverte qu'il
est descendu dans l'église par la cloison qui donne dans lescalier... ...il aurait ouvert la
petite porte qui est au dessus du tabernacle en forme de tiroir qui se ferme avec un taquet.
...il descendit par l'ouverture de la cloison qui est au-dessus de l'escalier.   
        
		[197v: Repond que la nuit du seize au dix Sept de Janvier dernier ...] 
		[198: passant devant la porte de la Chapelle du fort qui donne sur la Cour ouverte
il auroit monté a la tribune quensuitte il auroit descendu [198v] par louverture qui
est audessus dela Cloison de LEscallier ...] 
		[200: ... et que pour monter audessus dela Cloison qui est contre Lescallier dela
tribune [200v] il prit une planche qui etoit a terre et layant mise debout Contre La
Cloison il monta au moyen de Cela ...] 
			Interrogation de l'accusé, September 28, 1754   
		[247]  ... queffectivement il monta ala tribune ou il resta environ un quart dheur
[247v] a prier Dieu quensuitte pensant dans letat dhivresse ou il etoit que Dieu
lecouteroit de plus pres que de loin, il luy prit envie d'aller prier Dieu au bas
del'autel que pour cet effet il Descendit par louverture de la Cloison qui est
audessus de lescalier ...] 
		[251v] ... Repond quil en Sortit par le meme endroit dou il avoit descendu au
Moyen dun bout de planche quil mit contre La cloison] 
 
         
	[261-267] Défense de LeBon au Conseil Supérieur: ...l'accusé se ressouvint qu'il avait aidé
le sacristain peu de jours avant à accomoder l'autel, qu'elle n'était pas rangée à la mode de
France et que si on y donnait les mêmes décorations, elle en serait plus édifiante. Persuadé
de ses chimères, il descendit dans l'Eglise même, montant l'autel, il voulut attraper un
Coeur qui était attaché à la niche, la niche tombe et luy... (le blessa) ...A cella Il y a Bien
des suspicions on peut penser que la niche étant otée de sa place, il a crû qu'il pourrait par
le Haut du Tabernacle passer sa main au-dedans et en retirer les vases sacrés, mais ce
soupçon tombe de Luy même car s'il avait eu ce dessein en otant la niche, pourquoi
l'aurait-il...(remise en place). Interrogé, puis qu'il était ivre, comment il put faire de
remonter dans la tribuen par le même endroit(?) A répondu qu'il est vray qu'il eut
beaucoup de peine a y remonter et que ce fut au moien du morceau de bois. Et sur ce qui
luy a été représenté qu'il étoit plus naturel de chercher à sortir par la porte, a répondu qu'il
voulait s'en [retourner] par le même endroit parce qu'il sentoit qu'il avait fait une
faute. 
        
          
			Interrogation de l'accusé, October 28, 1754 
           
		[264] Interrogé pourquoy il Entroit dans laditte chapelle pour prier dieu et qu'il
descendit par La tribune voyant que Les portes Etoient fermé ... 
		Interrogé, puisqu'il etoit hivre, comment il put faire de Remonter dans la tribune
par Le même Endroit 
		a Repondu qu'il est vray ou'il Eut Beaucoup de peinne ay Remonter Et quile fut au
moien dun morceau de Bois 
		Et Sur Cequi Luy Eté representé quil Etoit plus naturel de chercher a Sortir par La
porte a Repondu qu'il vouloit Sen Retourner par Le même Endroit par cequ'il
Sentoit qu'il avoit fait une faute 
         
          Other
          Links 
		 
  
           Summarized
          Court Cases,  
          Trials, and Interrogations: Criminal 
  |